Friday, 13 June 2008

Movie Review:The Road To Guantánamo









In this compelling docudrama by Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross, the 'Tipton Three' narrate their own experiences in America's controversial offshore detention camp
The Road To Guantánamo opens with archive footage of George W Bush, flanked by a stern-faced Tony Blair, declaring his certain knowledge that all the detainees held in Guantánamo are "bad people". Everything that follows is designed to turn these words inside out, as three young British Muslims tell the story of how they came to be in US custody at Guantánamo for over two years, and discuss the Kafkaesque horrors that awaited them there, until finally they were released without charge or apology.
The title may evoke the Bing Crosby and Bob Hope 'Road' movies of the 1940s, travel-themed musical comedies with a vaguely racist depiction of non-Americans, but the exotic journey embarked upon by the so-called 'Tipton Three' was to take them into areas that were politically incorrect in an altogether different way. About to get married in Pakistan, Birmingham lad Asif Iqbal (Usman) invites his friends Ruhal Ahmed (Harun) and Shafiq Rasul (Ahmed) to join him there for a holiday. Accompanied by another friend called Monir (Siddiqui) and Shafiq's cousin Zahid (Iqbal), they head into Afghanistan, hoping to offer humanitarian aid to their fellow Muslims and to see the place for themselves. After several weeks, they realise they've made a terrible mistake and try to head back to Pakistan, instead ending up under heavy bombardment near Kundun. Separated from Monir (who is never seen again), they become captives of the Northern Alliance in the notorious Sheberghan Prison. Once it is discovered that the three friends are English, they are at first relieved to find themselves handed over to American custody; but in fact their nightmare is only just beginning, as they are passed from Kandahar Airbase to Camp X-Ray, from Camp Delta to solitary confinement, facing mistreatment, injustice and endless, pointless interrogations.

In The Road To Guantánamo, the misadventures of Asif, Ruhel and Shafiq are vividly reconstructed by actors, while at the same time anchored to reality by the intercutting of extensive interviews with the real trio, as well as occasional barrages of archival news footage. The result is an utterly devastating, gripping portrayal of innocents abroad falling foul of both large-scale international events and a US policy that seems cruel, inhuman and willfully blind, with the three men's testimonies a stark reminder that the awful, often darkly surreal events unfolding on screen actually took place. 'Intelligence' comes out of this film looking almost comically stupid. The interrogators are entirely convinced of their captives' guilt, but seem less sure of (and indeed less interested in) easily verifiable details like who the detainees are, what language they speak, and whether they were actually in England (under well-documented police probation) at the time that the interrogators insist they were meeting Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.
What the three actually have to say is rarely heeded, while manipulative lies, brutalisation, beatings, stress positions, and months of solitary confinement are regularly employed to persuade them of the interrogators' point of view. Of course such abuses will come as little surprise to anyone reading the newspapers, but to see them re-enacted (albeit with a certain restraint), and to hear the victims' personal accounts, has a much greater impact than the written word, putting paid to America's claims that the treatment of so-called 'enemy combatants' is, as Donald Rumsfeld puts it, "humane and appropriate and consistent with the Geneva Convention for the most part." It would be easy to criticise The Road to Guantánamo for being one-sided (it is), and for failing to contextualise the conduct of the US (there is not even a passing mention of 9/11), but such objections miss the point. Many times Bush, Blair and other politicians have used their considerable public platforms to present a similarly partisan, at times even subsequently discredited justification for different aspects of their 'War on Terror', including the unlimited detention without trial of men like the Tipton Three. The trio, and the more than 800 prisoners who remain at America's Cuban base, were not able to communicate their version of events to a lawyer or judge, let alone to the outside world. The Road To Guantánamo gives them their day in court, and the story these "bad people" tell is one that well deserves a hearing.


Verdict: Gripping, nightmarish, and at times bleakly funny, The Road To Guantánamo is far too important a personal testimony to go unheard.

Director: Michael Winterbottom

Release Date: 9 March 2006

Sunday, 8 June 2008

Movie Review: Partner





A successful 'love guru' struggles to get a hapless client hooked up with a national beauty in this lavish Bollywood comedy starring Salman Khan and Govinda.


Every now and then the complaint that Indian movie plots are 'inspired' by Hollywood stories (check out the similarities between, say, Kasoor and Jagged Edge or Main Azad Hoon and Meet John Doe) gets wheeled out and rapidly wheeled back in again.


For a start that would imply Hollywood is a source of originality; secondly, the name 'Bollywood' scarcely suggests a radical departure from the American way. Besides, how many US non-musicals ever stop the action for full-on dance extravaganzas?



Thus there's no real 'hitch' in surmising that the concept for Partner came from Will Smith's comedy smash Hitch. Salman Khan plays the smooth 'love guru' Prem, while co-star Govinda takes the role of the buffoonish Bhaskar, head-over-heels with out-of-his-league socialite beauty Priya (Kaif).


Not only does Prem have to strong-arm Bhaskar into romance, he finds his own allure failing to snare independent single mother, Lois Lane-style photojournalist Naina (Dutta).



Hitch was amiable if hardly groundbreaking entertainment and in this respect, Partner follows its lead. Comedy hitmaker David Dharwan decks his movie - and his stars - out in designer gladrags, revs up the catchy song-and-dance numbers and sits back with knowing satisfaction. The muscle-bound Khan, better known as Bollywood's bad boy, is no Will Smith in the charm department, coming over more as early period Sylvester Stallone, but his three co-stars all fulfill their designated roles, notably Govinda, who's given the lion's share of the one-liners.

Anyone hoping for an in-depth study of the morality of matchmaking will be disappointed; this is broad, brash escapism with the substance of candyfloss.


That's not necessarily a bad thing, particularly when you get, for example, a scene of a voice-activated rocket targeting a man on a jet-ski followed by a dance number straight out of 'Club Tropicana'-era Wham!


The dance numbers in general are colourful and high-energy, though a neat flamenco-esque pastiche works far better than a lame hip-hop rip-off.

So long as it hews close to the formula, Partner is at the very least inoffensive.

But a couple of brief moments mocking Thai people (on a Phuket jaunt) and some cliched homosexual gags don't sit well with the affable atmosphere.


And the unquestioning attitude that everything and everyone glamorous and wealthy is great makes you think the 1980s never ended. One shouldn't expect Satyajit Ray social commentary from every Indian film but if there's one Hollywood trend Bollywood doesn't need to ape, it's designer vacuousness.


Verdict: Exuberant, empty-headed entertainment cribbed from Hollywood but put through the Bollywood mixer to produce a crowd-pleasing blend for fans.


Director: David Dhawan
Release date: 20 July 2007

Movie Review: Khuda Ke Liya (In The Name Of God)







There has always been an impression that Pakistani film industry churns out the most pathetic films ever on the face of this earth and I can`t blame anyone who thinks so.

It has been years since the Pakistani film industry has managed to produce even a single decent movie (let alone a good one).

However, things now seem to change with the arrival of a Pakistani movie called “Khuda Ke Liye: In the Name of God”.


This is the most big budget movie ever in the history of the Pakistani film industry and is a movie of international standards and quality, which consists of an excellent plot,excellent performances,great music and great camerawork.


The film is produced,directed and written by Shoaib Mansoor, who had been directing Pakistani TV serials before and this is his first attempt at film-making. The film stars Pakistan`s top film actor, Shan, Pakistan`s No.1 model Iman Ali along with Fawad Khan, Austin Sayre, Rasheed Naz, Simi Raheal and (in a guest appearance) Naseerudin Shah.


The movie is about the problems faced by the modern,educated and liberal Muslims in today`s times who are disliked by the fundamentalists in their own community because of their modern thinking and their western attire and at the same time they are viewed suspiciously by the western world too because of their Muslim names, post the 9/11 incident.The film tells the story about two brothers, Mansoor (Shan) and Sarmad (Fuwad Khan).

Both of them are musicians and belong to a well-to-do family in Lahore.

One day, Sarmad, through a religious friend of his, meets Maulana Taheri (Rasheed Naz), who tells him that music is har*am (prohibited) in Islam. He also asks him that as a Muslim it`s his duty that he should grow a beard and should not wear western clothes.



Due to Maulana Taheri`s brainwashing, Sarmad completely transforms himself into a mullah. He grows a beard,starts wearing shalwar kameez and gives up music.He even asks his mother to start wearing a burkha. On the other hand,there is Marie (Iman Ali), who lives in London with her Pakistani father.

Her mother had passed away years ago and currently,her father is in a live-in relationship with a British woman.

Marie has a British boyfriend called Dave, whom she intends to get married with. Marie`s father does not approve of this relationship as he feels that if his daughter will get married to a non-Muslim, it will be a disgrace to himself, within his Muslim community.



Therefore, he deceives Marie by asking her to go with him to Lahore and promises her that once they return to Londond,he will get her married to Dave. Marie believes her father and goes to Lahore.

Mansoor and Sarmad happen to be Marie`s cousins as they are her paternal uncle`s sons. Therefore, Mary and her father stay at their place. Marie`s father tries to convince Mansoor to marry his daughter but Mansoor refuses this proposal as he doesn`t want to cheat Marie.

As a result, Marie`s father asks Sarmad to marry his daughter and so they take Marie to Waziristan (a hilly area near the Pak-Afghan border), where they forcibly get Marie married to Sarmad.



On the other hand,Mansoor flies off to USA as he gets admission in a music school in USA. There,Mansoor meets Jenny (Austin Sayre) and both of them fall in love with each other. When the 9/11 incident takes place,Mansoor and Jenny get married to each other before things might get worse.

One night,when both of them are asleep the USA police authorities take Mansoor to a jail and arrest him, suspecting him to be a terrorist who played a part in the Twin Towers attack on 9/11.

So,now there is Marie,trapped in Waziristan and trying to escape from there and in USA, there is Mansoor who is being manhandled by the USA police authorities.


The strongest points of this movie are Shoaib Mansoor`s direction and the dialogues. Despite the serious and socio-political theme of the film it doesn`t bore the viewer at all. The film is very gripping and some of the best scenes of the movie are as follows:

-When Sarmad turns into a maulvi and tells his brother that he wouldn`t play music as it is haraam

-When Marie is taken to Waziristan and is forced by her father to get married to Sarmad.

-When Marie tries to escape from Waziristan and her husband chases her with help of his mullah friend

-When Mansoor is in the police station and writes ‘I LOVE USA’ on the wall but after sometime adds MA to USA making it ‘I LOVE USAMA’.

-The BEST scene of the movie is where Naseerudin Shah gives his speech in the courtroom.



That is the major highlight of the movie.
The dialogues of the movie are excellent and have a great impact on the audiences. For example the dialogue ‘deen main darhi hai,darhi main deen nahin’ (‘having beard is in the religion, the religion is not in beard’) and there are also some funny one liners such as ‘Maybe Osama Bin Laden is gay and he likes me’.

The dialogues in Naseerudin Shah`s speech in the courtroom are such that they make you sit up and think.


The film tries to answer some of the most important questions which every Muslim wants to ask; questions which interfere with the daily lives of millions of Muslims such as; is music har'am?

Is it necessary to have a beard?

Is it a sin to wear jeans,etc.?

Is it sinful for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim man?

Does Islam encourage terrorism?

The film answers these questions in such a convincing manner that you can`t help but agree with everything.

The music of the movie is also really nice and my favourite songs are ‘Bandya’ and ‘Allah Hoo’.



The Verdict: Interesting movie that i would encourage film lovers and non-film lovers to take a look at, will change your thought's on Islam altogether.


Dicrector: Shoaib Mansoor
Release date: 2 November 2007

Movie Review: U, Me Aur Hum (You, Me and Us)


An energetic, careening Bollywood story of love at first sight that embraces tragedy, comedy and everything in between.
All that can be said about U, Me Aur Hum is implicit in its truly barmy plotline that borrows from
Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind, Dirty Dancing, and 50 First Dates. A distinguished looking man and his teenage son are in a restaurant when they strike up a dare to woo some women. The son picks his father's target and he endeavors to win her over by telling what at first appears to be a love story about a couple he used to know.

The film-within-a-film begins, the couple played by the same actors, but it will take some time, three hours to be precise, to discover the reason for this. Ajay (Devgan) and Piya (Kajol) meet on a cruise ship. She is a bar steward. He is a psychiatrist, and accompanied by two couples, one 'unhappily married' and one 'happily unmarried' we are told.
One drunken night in the cruise ship's pole dancing club, Ajay falls in love with Piya. She is unamused by Ajay's advances, so he sneaks into her room to leave flowers, and discovers her diary or 'Book of Possibilities' - a scrapbook of memories, hopes and dreams.
Ajay sets about putting this knowledge to good use, and manipulates Piya into falling for him over the course of several early morning salsa dancing lessons. Ajay is pressured by his friends to confess, and eventually does so, causing Piya to renounce him immediately.
Months later, Ajay has bought a Labrador (Piya's favourite breed) and an all-white apartment with a huge portrait painting of his true love hung on the wall. One day, Piya arrives on his doorstep professing her love.
They roll around on the off-white carpet, they walk around barefoot holding glasses of wine, they kiss on the balcony, and they get married. Piya becomes more and more forgetful, until Ajay finds her wandering outside their apartment, having blanked on their address, his number, and his name.
A doctor diagnoses the 27 year-old Piya with Alzheimer's disease. She's also pregnant. Her condition worsens with the progress of her pregnancy, and when the baby is born, she has a full-time carer. After a near-tragedy when the baby is left alone in the bath tub, Ajay decides Piya must go into a care home. He has a crisis, resolves this crisis, and decides to bring Piya home.

Every day he must make her fall in love with him all over again. Although the audience will guess the film's conclusion an hour or so in, it is still pleasing after all the highs, the lows, and the improbabilities.
"Colorful, noisy, and spanning the extremes of the emotional scale "

The song and dance numbers are few and far between, crow barred into the plot as it takes the downhill slide into depressing illness territory. Although Piya's Alzheimer's disease leans heavily on the frivolity of the first half of the film, this change of gear revives flagging interest and makes for a gripping finale. Bollywood movies are made to be watched with an excited and involved crowd, as an afternoon long outing, involving an interval in which the audience can brace itself for the twists and turns of the second half.

As such the convoluted and hyperbolic plot is not only fitting, but fundamental to the experience. U, Me Aur Hum celebrates the cinema experience, it's colorful, noisy, and spans the extremes of the emotional scale. It valiantly strives and succeeds to tirelessly entertain.
Verdict: A cliched rollercoaster that is no less enjoyable for being just that.

Director: Ajay Devgan
Release date: April 2008